Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMazurina, Olgaen
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-21T06:58:58Z
dc.date.available2013-05-21T06:58:58Z
dc.date.issued2012-07
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10797/6478
dc.description.abstractThe talk about the relationship between literature, philosophy, history and science crops again and again and is found in the works by modern philosophers such as Richard Rorty, Arthur Danto and some others as well as by literary critics, for example Wolfgang Iser. Some of them see the boundary between philosophy and literature while others dismiss it. Many philosophers believe that a true philosophical insight is best served ‘au naturele’; style should not overtake the message. On the other hand, we could remember classical examples of philosophers whose literary style has become indispensable to the philosophical success. In my report I would like to discuss R. Rorty’s view on the problem, his understanding of representation and the critical approach to his view.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.subjectPhilosophyen
dc.subjectLiteratureen
dc.subjectStyleen
dc.subjectMessageen
dc.subjectArgumenten
dc.subjectRealityen
dc.subjectFictionen
dc.subjectWorld-viewen
dc.titleThe dialogue between philosophy and literatureen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjecten


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record