Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorΜούζα, Άννα Μαρίαel_GR
dc.contributor.authorΓρηγοριάδου, Σοφίαel_GR
dc.contributor.authorMouza, Anna Mariaen
dc.contributor.authorGrigoriadou, Sofiaen
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-07T05:19:39Z
dc.date.available2016-04-07T05:19:39Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn0024-2535
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10797/14893en
dc.descriptionΠεριέχει τη περίληψηel_GR
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this paper is to identify the obligations and responsibilities of librarians, working in Greek academic libraries and to investigate whether there are significant differences among various institutions. Design/methodology/approach – The survey was based on a questionnaire containing 161 duties performed by academic librarians, classified into five main categories which are: general management, collection management, materials organization, user service and system management. The respondents were 31 managers at Greek academic libraries, who were asked to assess their duties according to importance, difficulty and frequency, and whether such tasks were deemed professional, para-professional or non-professional. A two-way ANOVA was applied to determine whether performed duties significantly differed according to institution size and/or type. Findings – The results revealed no significant differences regarding importance of duties while many differences were detected across all main categories regarding difficulty. Differences were also recorded concerning the frequency of duties for some of the subcategories under general and collection management, materials organization and the subcategory cultural events and programs. Finally, professional duties represented 86 percent of total duties, indicating the necessity of professional librarians for the effective management of their responsibilities. Originality/value – These findings, which are first recorded in Greece and refer to academic librarians’ duties, will be particularly useful for decision makers to reach the right decisions regarding the implementation of human resource practices, taking into account the individuality of the institutions under consideration. Also these outcomes can be viewed as a valuable guide for adapting the indicated decisions under the rapidly introduced technological changes and properly tackling problems stemming from the economic recession.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.sourceLibrary, Information Science & Technology Abstracts (LISTA)en
dc.sourceLibrary Management. 2016, Vol. 37 Issue 1/2, p29-54. 26p.en
dc.source.urihttp://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=3&sid=54ad52bf-4148-4bd3-bcc7-945d79304439%40sessionmgr120&hid=115&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=113760400&db=lxhen
dc.titleJob analysis of academic librarians in Greece: investigating differences among institutions regarding obligations and responsibilitiesen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.subject.uncontrolledtermAcademic librariesen
dc.subject.uncontrolledtermEconomic crisisen
dc.subject.uncontrolledtermGreeceen
dc.subject.uncontrolledtermJob analysisen
dc.subject.uncontrolledtermJob descriptionen
dc.subject.uncontrolledtermObligations and responsibilitiesen
dc.subject.JITAΒιβλιοθήκες ως φυσικές συλλογές, Ακαδημαϊκές βιβλιοθήκεςel_GR
dc.subject.JITALibraries as physical collections, Academic librariesen
dc.identifier.JITADDen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record